Amazing! I opened a thread here and people are sharing their IOE numbers.
It seems there are different numbers than 91 and it would mean we should go IOE9******** 100M ? Does that worth it? :)
met zey
over 2 years ago
Another peak gave me the assumption that IOE9x numbers are very rare and are for less frequent case types. So I think IOE09x approach still works and it already gave us 2M new cases.